How the World Bank Group Gauges "Broad Community Support"

On October 9th, the World Resources Institute’s International Financial Flows and Environment (IFFE) team co-sponsored a panel discussion with Oxfam America and Center for International Environmental Law on How the World Bank Group Gauges ‘Broad Community Support’ for Projects. The discussion came during the Civil Society Policy Forum of the 2008 Fall Annual Meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington, D.C. Read the summary report (PDF, 416 Kb, 19 pages).

The World Bank and International Financial Corporation (IFC) require clients to obtain “broad community support” before beginning high impact projects. WRI believes that the broad community support standard is increasingly relevant, given the significant growth of World Bank investments in sectors—especially in extractive industries—that can have significant impacts on local communities. In 2004, IFC’s Extractive Industries Review recommended that “broad community support” be included in the Bank’s suite of standards. Since then, it has been incorporated into the WBG’s Operational Policy on Indigenous People’s, as well as IFC’s policy on Social and Environmental Sustainability. As of August 2008, IFC has applied free, prior and informed consultation and broad community support to 18 projects.

However, increased instances of conflict around natural resources, and/or fundamental weaknesses in sector governance in areas where extractive projects are underway or envisioned highlight need for closer examination of the BCS standard and its application.

The panel examined and discussed practical experiences and challenges of implementing the broad community support standard in a selection of World Bank Group projects. Based on experiences to date, the session participants identified several key challenges and concerns related to BCS standard implementation.

This conference report (PDF, 416 Kb, 19 pages) provides a summary of the panel presentation, the challenges and concerns identified by the panel participants, and proposes next steps to continue this important discussion.

  • Associate
    Isabel Munilla is an Associate of the Institutions and Governance Program at the World Resources Institute (WRI).
    1 202-729-7711
Comments
Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is to verify that you are indeed an actual person, and not a spam-bot or other nuisance.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.